Treatment with decitabine induces the expression of stemness markers, PD-L1 and NY-ESO-1 in colorectal cancer: potential for combined chemoimmunotherapy
submitted on 2024-01-04, 09:34 and posted on 2024-01-04, 10:38authored byNassiba Taib, Maysaloun Merhi, Varghese Inchakalody, Sarra Mestiri, Shereena Hydrose, Karama Makni-Maalej, Afsheen Raza, Fairooz Sahir, Fouad Azizi, Parveen B. Nizamuddin, Queenie Fernandes, Zeenath Safira K. M. Yoosuf, Salam Almoghrabi, Lobna Al-Zaidan, Alaaeldin Shablak, Shahab Uddin, Cristina Maccalli, Mohammed Ussama Al Homsi, Said Dermime
<h2>Background</h2><p dir="ltr">The mechanism of tumor immune escape and progression in colorectal cancer (CRC) is widely investigated in-vitro to help understand and identify agents that might play a crucial role in response to treatment and improve the overall survival of CRC patients. Several mechanisms of immune escape and tumor progression, including expression of stemness markers, inactivation of immunoregulatory genes by methylation, and epigenetic silencing, have been reported in CRC, indicating the potential of demethylating agents as anti-cancer drugs. Of these, a chemotherapeutic demethylating agent, Decitabine (DAC), has been reported to induce a dual effect on both DNA demethylation and histone changes leading to an increased expression of target biomarkers, thus making it an attractive anti-tumorigenic drug.</p><h2>Methods</h2><p dir="ltr">We compared the effect of DAC in primary 1076 Col and metastatic 1872 Col cell lines isolated and generated from patients’ tumor tissues. Both cell lines were treated with DAC, and the expression of the NY-ESO-1 cancer-testis antigen, the PD-L1 immunoinhibitory marker, and the CD44, Nanog, KLF-4, CD133, MSI-1 stemness markers were analyzed using different molecular and immunological assays.</p><h2>Results</h2><p dir="ltr">DAC treatment significantly upregulated stemness markers in both primary 1076 Col and meta-static 1872 Col cell lines, although a lower effect occurred on the latter: CD44 (7.85 fold; ***p = 0.0001 vs. (4.19 fold; *p = 0.0120), Nanog (4.1 fold; ***p < 0.0001 vs.1.69 fold; ***p = 0.0008), KLF-4 (4.33 fold; ***p < 0.0001 vs.2.48 fold; ***p = 0.0005), CD133 (16.77 fold; ***p = 0.0003 vs.6.36 fold; *p = 0.0166), and MSI-1 (2.33 fold; ***p = 0.0003 vs.2.3 fold; ***p = 0.0004), respectively. Interestingly, in the metastatic 1872 Col cells treated with DAC, the expression of both PD-L1 and NY-ESO-1 was increased tenfold (*p = 0.0128) and fivefold (***p < 0.0001), respectively.</p><h2>Conclusions</h2><p dir="ltr">We conclude that the upregulation of both stemness and immune checkpoint markers by DAC treatment on CRC cells might represent a mechanism of immune evasion. In addition, induction of NY-ESO-1 may represent an immuno-therapeutic option in metastatic CRC patients. Finally, the combination of DAC and anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies treatment should represent a potential therapeutic intervention for this group of patients.</p><p dir="ltr"><br></p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of Translational Medicine<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04073-y" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04073-y</a></p>
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.
This Item is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Institution affiliated with
Hamad Medical Corporation
National Center for Cancer Care and Research - HMC
Interim Translational Research Institute - HMC
Dermatology Institute - HMC
Qatar University
Laboratory Animal Research Center - QU
College of Medicine - QU HEALTH
Sidra Medicine
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
College of Health and Life Sciences - HBKU
Methodology
We compared the effect of DAC in primary 1076 Col and metastatic 1872 Col cell lines isolated and generated from patients’ tumor tissues. Both cell lines were treated with DAC, and the expression of the NY-ESO-1 cancer-testis antigen, the PD-L1 immunoinhibitory marker, and the CD44, Nanog, KLF-4, CD133, MSI-1 stemness markers were analyzed using different molecular and immunological assays.