submitted on 2024-08-07, 08:53 and posted on 2024-08-07, 08:55authored byLeonardo Micheli, Greg P. Smestad, Muhammad Zahid Khan, Katja Lange, Huda M. I. Almughary, Mounir Abraim, Yanal Alamat, Cody B. Anderson, Said Bentouba, Benjamin Figgis, Pavan Fuke, Ahmed Amine Hachicha, Mounia Karim, Anil Kottantharayil, Alfredo A. Martinez-Morales, Ahmed Alami Merrouni, Douglas Olivares, Giovanni Picotti, Jorge Rabanal-Arabach, Florian Wiesinger, Klemens Ilse
<p dir="ltr">The use of image analysis has often been suggested as a practical way to monitor the soiling accumulated on the surfaces of solar energy conversion devices. Indeed, the deposited soiling particles can be counted and characterized to calculate the area they cover, and this area can be converted into an energy loss. However, several particle counting methodologies exist and can lead to dissimilar results. This work focuses on the role of thresholding, an essential step where particles are distinguished from a background based on the pixel brightness. Sixteen automatic thresholding methods are assessed using 13 200 micrographs of glass coupons soiled at nine locations globally. In low‐to‐intermediate soiling conditions, the “Triangle” method is found to return the minimum coefficient of variation and a mean deviation closer to zero. On the other hand, methods assuming a bimodal distribution of pixel brightness underestimate the area coverage. In addition, since soiling can be unevenly distributed over a surface, different loss estimations can be returned when the same image analysis process is used on different spots on a sample's surface. For these reasons, image analysis should be repeated at multiple locations on each investigated surface.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Solar RRL<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/solr.202300654" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/solr.202300654</a></p>