Manara - Qatar Research Repository
Browse

Methodological Americanism: Disciplinary senility and intellectual hegemonies in (American) public administration

Download (1.76 MB)
journal contribution
submitted on 2025-06-30, 07:36 and posted on 2025-06-30, 07:37 authored by Kim Moloney, Meng-Hsuan Chou, Philip Osei, Yonique Campbell

In this introduction, we introduce the concept of methodological Americanism to describe and explain the epistemological problem plaguing the public administration discipline. We argue that the discipline, dominated by US-focused analyses, is methodologically nationalist and White and represents a hegemonic intellectualism that limits what is “knowable.” To ensure continual disciplinary relevance of public administration studies, we propose that epistemological diversity—achievable by reshaping the disciplinary table—is the way forward. We conclude by summarizing how the articles in this first of two Special Issues contribute to paving the way toward epistemological diversity.

Other Information

Published in: Administrative Theory & Praxis
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
See article on publisher's website: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2140387

Funding

Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.

History

Language

  • English

Publisher

Routledge

Publication Year

  • 2022

License statement

This Item is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Institution affiliated with

  • Hamad Bin Khalifa University
  • College of Public Policy - HBKU

Geographic coverage

United States

Usage metrics

    College of Public Policy - HBKU

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC